Social and political commentary from a conservative perspective

Turkmenbashi the Great is dead

December 21st, 2006 10:57 am// Bel //

Now how the hell did that happen?

Wasn’t he supposed to be immortal or something?

He won’t be best pleased.

6 Responses to “Turkmenbashi the Great is dead”

  1. Serf Says:
    December 21st, 2006 at 11:52 am

    Turkmenbashi the Great is dead

    ……Rearrange these words….

    Turkmenbashi is dead, Great

  2. Bel Says:
    December 21st, 2006 at 11:53 am

    That made me laugh out loud. Well said! :)

  3. james higham Says:
    December 21st, 2006 at 8:51 pm

    He won’t indeed and nor will you, ma’am, as you’ve been tagged. I’m so sorry:

    Question: What are the best seven things you’ve done this past year?

    http://nourishingobscurity.blogspot.com/2006/12/tagged-seven-best-things-you-did-this.html

    Yours, James

  4. Colin Campbell Says:
    December 21st, 2006 at 9:11 pm

    Reading the article, I am shocked that the US and its allies hadn’t already chosen this spot for their next politically motivated invasion and occupation, to liberate the poor oppressed citizens and the gas reserves for the world. Perhaps there were no weapons of mass destruction.

  5. Bel Says:
    December 21st, 2006 at 9:40 pm

    Turkmenbashi was canny enough to support the USA when they invaded his neighbours, Afghanistan. America was in no hurry to turf the joker out of power. With that kind of support, he could have slain all the firstborn in the sight of the sun.

  6. Bel Says:
    December 21st, 2006 at 9:50 pm

    James, no problem.

    I consider myself tagged.

Leave a Reply