<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bel is thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beltoday.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beltoday.com</link>
	<description>Social and political commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on David Cairns and his resignation letter by The Wilted Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.beltoday.com/200809472/comment-page-1#comment-135540</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wilted Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beltoday.com/?p=472#comment-135540</guid>
		<description>I'm sure Cairns feels embarrassed now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Cairns feels embarrassed now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Labour&#8217;s delusion by Bel</title>
		<link>http://www.beltoday.com/200807labours-delusion/comment-page-1#comment-66518</link>
		<dc:creator>Bel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 18:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beltoday.com/?p=469#comment-66518</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;By the way all the alternatives to Brown as leader seem worse to me.. either nonentities or crooks..&lt;/em&gt;

The best that can be said about them is that they are no better and no worse than Brown.

I don't even know if that isn't even too kind.

Is it possible for anyone to be worse than Brown?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By the way all the alternatives to Brown as leader seem worse to me.. either nonentities or crooks..</em></p>
<p>The best that can be said about them is that they are no better and no worse than Brown.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even know if that isn&#8217;t even too kind.</p>
<p>Is it possible for anyone to be worse than Brown?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Labour&#8217;s delusion by mutley</title>
		<link>http://www.beltoday.com/200807labours-delusion/comment-page-1#comment-66485</link>
		<dc:creator>mutley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beltoday.com/?p=469#comment-66485</guid>
		<description>But they couldnt replace the PM again without an election could they?  Any electoral legitimacy they had has disappeared.  By the way all the alternatives to Brown as leader seem worse to me.. either nonentities or crooks..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But they couldnt replace the PM again without an election could they?  Any electoral legitimacy they had has disappeared.  By the way all the alternatives to Brown as leader seem worse to me.. either nonentities or crooks..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Labour&#8217;s delusion by Calumcarr</title>
		<link>http://www.beltoday.com/200807labours-delusion/comment-page-1#comment-61523</link>
		<dc:creator>Calumcarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beltoday.com/?p=469#comment-61523</guid>
		<description>Bel

Thanks.  I didn't know you still visited. I'll keep an eye out for "Dutch" visitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bel</p>
<p>Thanks.  I didn&#8217;t know you still visited. I&#8217;ll keep an eye out for &#8220;Dutch&#8221; visitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Labour&#8217;s delusion by Bel</title>
		<link>http://www.beltoday.com/200807labours-delusion/comment-page-1#comment-61443</link>
		<dc:creator>Bel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beltoday.com/?p=469#comment-61443</guid>
		<description>A bit to the left of New Labour.

My, you must be having a hard time at the moment! :) Not one single party with views you completely espouse. Mind you, I feel the same way about the Conservatives. I'm a bit to the right of Cameron - that's not saying much, admittedly.

Yes, I remember suggesting you join Blogpower.:) Having emigrated to the Netherlands, I'm no longer that much into UK political blogging. However, your blog is one of the few I regularly visit. I like the mix between personal and political stories. Here's hoping you keep blogging! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit to the left of New Labour.</p>
<p>My, you must be having a hard time at the moment! <img src='http://www.beltoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Not one single party with views you completely espouse. Mind you, I feel the same way about the Conservatives. I&#8217;m a bit to the right of Cameron - that&#8217;s not saying much, admittedly.</p>
<p>Yes, I remember suggesting you join Blogpower.:) Having emigrated to the Netherlands, I&#8217;m no longer that much into UK political blogging. However, your blog is one of the few I regularly visit. I like the mix between personal and political stories. Here&#8217;s hoping you keep blogging! <img src='http://www.beltoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Labour&#8217;s delusion by CalumCarr</title>
		<link>http://www.beltoday.com/200807labours-delusion/comment-page-1#comment-61344</link>
		<dc:creator>CalumCarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beltoday.com/?p=469#comment-61344</guid>
		<description>Bel

"&lt;em&gt;But as to the Tories being seen as electable, why ‘God forbid?’&lt;/em&gt;"

I think you know the answer to that one.  I'm a bit to the left of new labour.

You may have forgotten but you have a lot to answer for.  It was you who suggested I join Blogpower!   :-)

I've missed your daily posts.  i'll ry to visit moer often now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bel</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>But as to the Tories being seen as electable, why ‘God forbid?’</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you know the answer to that one.  I&#8217;m a bit to the left of new labour.</p>
<p>You may have forgotten but you have a lot to answer for.  It was you who suggested I join Blogpower!   <img src='http://www.beltoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve missed your daily posts.  i&#8217;ll ry to visit moer often now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Labour&#8217;s delusion by Bel</title>
		<link>http://www.beltoday.com/200807labours-delusion/comment-page-1#comment-61284</link>
		<dc:creator>Bel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beltoday.com/?p=469#comment-61284</guid>
		<description>Hi Calum,

Long, long time! :)

I hope you are well.

I agree with what you say about the unelectability of one party leading to the other party getting a much freer ride than they deserved.

But as to the Tories being seen as electable, why 'God forbid?'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Calum,</p>
<p>Long, long time! <img src='http://www.beltoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I hope you are well.</p>
<p>I agree with what you say about the unelectability of one party leading to the other party getting a much freer ride than they deserved.</p>
<p>But as to the Tories being seen as electable, why &#8216;God forbid?&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Labour&#8217;s delusion by CalumCarr</title>
		<link>http://www.beltoday.com/200807labours-delusion/comment-page-1#comment-61271</link>
		<dc:creator>CalumCarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beltoday.com/?p=469#comment-61271</guid>
		<description>Hi Bel

Many moons have passed since last I commented here.

Nich (or is it Nick)has saved me from writing too much. He's right imo.  

I think in 2005 anger at Blair masked unhappiness in general with Labour.  Blair's going allowed true views of Labour to be heard.  Also the unelectability of Labour during the Thatcher years and of the Tories since 1997 allowed the governments to last longer than they would otherwise have done.  Now, God forbid, with the Tories being seen as electable Labour plummet in the polls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bel</p>
<p>Many moons have passed since last I commented here.</p>
<p>Nich (or is it Nick)has saved me from writing too much. He&#8217;s right imo.  </p>
<p>I think in 2005 anger at Blair masked unhappiness in general with Labour.  Blair&#8217;s going allowed true views of Labour to be heard.  Also the unelectability of Labour during the Thatcher years and of the Tories since 1997 allowed the governments to last longer than they would otherwise have done.  Now, God forbid, with the Tories being seen as electable Labour plummet in the polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Labour&#8217;s delusion by Bel</title>
		<link>http://www.beltoday.com/200807labours-delusion/comment-page-1#comment-60572</link>
		<dc:creator>Bel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beltoday.com/?p=469#comment-60572</guid>
		<description>Hi Nich, welcome to the blog. Your first time to comment here, I think. :)

Yes, I agree. It all seems rather cyclical, doesn't it? Having said that, I rather suspect that the ferocity of the public anger this time around is driven by the fact that they had actually placed a lot of trust and goodwill in Blair, Brown, and Labour. I don't think, in the years the Tories were in office, that they ever had that much goodwill from the public. Perhaps people voted for them out of a resigned sense that they were more competent with the economy than Labour were.

As for the Tories 12 years from now, I think the public is now so jaded about politicians("they're all the same, etc"), that nobody will manage to work up quite the same level of anger in 12 years time. The expectations of the public have been drastically lowered, so I suspect that, so long as the Tories don't sell us all into slavery, they will be tolerated, albeit with cynicism and contempt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nich, welcome to the blog. Your first time to comment here, I think. <img src='http://www.beltoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yes, I agree. It all seems rather cyclical, doesn&#8217;t it? Having said that, I rather suspect that the ferocity of the public anger this time around is driven by the fact that they had actually placed a lot of trust and goodwill in Blair, Brown, and Labour. I don&#8217;t think, in the years the Tories were in office, that they ever had that much goodwill from the public. Perhaps people voted for them out of a resigned sense that they were more competent with the economy than Labour were.</p>
<p>As for the Tories 12 years from now, I think the public is now so jaded about politicians(&#8221;they&#8217;re all the same, etc&#8221;), that nobody will manage to work up quite the same level of anger in 12 years time. The expectations of the public have been drastically lowered, so I suspect that, so long as the Tories don&#8217;t sell us all into slavery, they will be tolerated, albeit with cynicism and contempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Labour&#8217;s delusion by Nich Starling</title>
		<link>http://www.beltoday.com/200807labours-delusion/comment-page-1#comment-60522</link>
		<dc:creator>Nich Starling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beltoday.com/?p=469#comment-60522</guid>
		<description>The interesting thing is the words you use could as easily have been used to describe the Tories in the 1992-97 parliament. I don't doubt they are heartfelt and much of what you say is true, but I am willing to anticipace the same level of bile towards the Tories in 12 years or so time.

What goes around comes around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interesting thing is the words you use could as easily have been used to describe the Tories in the 1992-97 parliament. I don&#8217;t doubt they are heartfelt and much of what you say is true, but I am willing to anticipace the same level of bile towards the Tories in 12 years or so time.</p>
<p>What goes around comes around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
